MicroRNA Levels in Exhaled Breath Condensate of Patients with Esophageal Atresia.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are noncoding RNAs that play an important role in the regulation of inflammation and have not been evaluated in exhaled breath condensates (EBC) of patients with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (EA-TEF). It is aimed to evaluate the levels of miRNA-21 and miRNA-24 in EBC of patients with EA-TEF. Patients who received surgery for EA-TEF (EA) were assessed for age, sex, types of anomaly, surgical treatments, and respiratory problems. A 500-1000 mL of EBC was obtained from each participant with EcoScreen. The levels of miRNA-21 and miRNA-24 in the EBC were analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction and compared between the EA group and the control group consisting of healthy children with no history of respiratory problems (n = 17). The levels of miRNAs in relation to respiratory problems and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) were also assessed. A total of 19 patients were enrolled in the EA group with a mean age of 7.8 ± 3.2 years and a male-to-female ratio of 10:9 EA cases had significantly lower levels of miRNA-21 (P < 0.05) compared to that in control group. The miRNA-24 levels did not differ between groups (P > 0.05). EA patients with positive pH testing for GER (n = 6) and fundoplication (n = 6) had higher levels of miRNA-21 than those with normal pH testing and without fundoplication, respectively (n = 13, P < 0.05). The levels of miRNA-21 and miRNA-24 did not differ between patients with and without proton pump inhibitor treatment (P > 0.05). The lower levels of miRNA-21 in the EBC of EA patients suggest a hyperreactive airway problem, which may be associated with GER and its surgical treatment.

Omalizumab treatment in adolescents with chronic spontaneous urticaria: Efficacy and safety

BACKGROUND: Omalizumab is useful as an add-on treatment in patients unresponsive to high doses of second-generation antihistamines. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of omalizumab treatment in adolescents with refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). METHODS: CSU patients aged 12-18 years old with the diagnosis of symptomatic CSU and unresponsive to classical treatment were included in the study. All patients had an urticaria-activity-score (UAS7) of ≥ 16 or and were treated with 300 mg omalizumab every four weeks. The degree of response was classified into complete, partial and non-responders due to UAS7. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients were evaluated. The median age and symptom onset age of the patients was 15.2 (IQR, 12.8-16.5) years and 14.0 (IQR, 11.8-15.9) years, respectively. The median duration of urticaria was eight (IQR, 4-24) months at admission. Eleven (37.9%) patients had angioedema and ten (34.5%) patients had concomitant allergic diseases. The median age at the beginning of treatment with omalizumab was 15.4 (IQR, 12.9-16.9) years. The median symptom duration was 12 (IQR, 6.5-27.5) months before the omalizumab treatment. Twenty-eight (96.5%) of the patients (89.6% complete, 6.9% partial) achieved response; however, one patient was a non-responder (3.5%). The adverse effect was observed in one (3.4%) patient as angioedema after the third dose. Twenty-three patients were followed up for a median of 18 (IQR, 13-27) months. Relapse was observed in three (13%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Omalizumab is considered as an effective and safe treatment for CSU in adolescents. Relapses mostly occur within the first year after the cessation of treatment

No disponible

Physicians prescribe adrenaline autoinjectors, do parents use them when needed?

Background: Anaphylaxis is a sudden, severe, and potentially life-threatening allergic reaction, affecting a portion of allergic patients. Adrenaline is the first-line medication for anaphylaxis and available in many parts of the world as adrenaline autoinjectors (AAIs). Objective: Aim of this study was to determine attitudes and knowledge levels of patients/parents regarding the use of AAIs, frequency, and rate of appropriate AAI use and to give a standardized and better education by improving on mistakes during administration. Method: 190 patients aged 1-18 years who were prescribed AAIs for any reason between 2012 and 2017 in Hacettepe University Pediatric Allergy Unit. Demographic data were collected during face-to-face interview or by telephone. Parents completed a mini-survey regarding use, carriage, and storage of AAI. Results: Some 190 patients (64.7% male) aged 7.83 (4.99-12.08) years, median (inter-quartile), were included in the study. The indications for AAI prescription were food allergy (78.9%); venom allergy (14.2%); idiopathic anaphylaxis (3.7%); mastocytosis (2.1%); and drug allergy (1.0%). One-fourth of AAI-prescribed patients experienced anaphylaxis requiring the use of AAI within the past five years. However, only 30% of the patients dared to use AAI; only three-quarters of whom had managed to use it correctly. Conclusion: After prescription of AAI and initial training, patients and parents' concerns and fears should be taken into consideration and necessary support should be provided. At every opportunity and each clinical visit, not only should training sessions be repeated but also the patients and parents should be psychologically supported

No disponible